Motor Mouth: Stellantis pulling out of Ontario battery plant

Follow the money

But that’s about it for common knowledge. Indeed, there is a bounty of misinformation regarding why all these monies are being offered, and where they come from. First among those mis-directions are all the news reports detailing how automakers’ — and their home country’s politicians’ — ire is centred on the IRA’s promise of a generous US$7,500 consumer incentive, officially outlined in the bill’s 30D clauses.

More importantly, this is not a one-time deal, like the grants desperate politicians typically offer to automakers to build an assembly plant in their jurisdiction. Instead, that US$45 for every kWh produced is being offered as an ongoing bonus, payable from the time the plant starts producing batteries; until 2032, when the program runs its course.

Follow the money some more

The amount of blarney surrounding this story is truly worthy of the politicians spinning it. The one estimate that would, however, appear to be believable is that the Stellantis-LG plant will generate 2,500 new jobs. After that, well, the spin starts to get truly outlandish.

For instance, according to reports, some politicians think the Windsor plant will generate 25,000 new jobs, or that 25,000 existing jobs will be saved. They arrive at that figure by factoring in 10 new ancillary jobs for every primary new employment opening at the battery plant. That’s not quite double the estimate that the Trillium Network for Advanced Manufacturing – the analysts who have done the best job of analyzing the auto industry and the effect of battery manufacturing on Canadian employment – would be reasonable to presume. But nonetheless, just for giggle’s sake, let’s go with 25,000 jobs.

Splitting $13 billion some 25,000 ways works out to $520,000. That’s how much every one of those jobs will cost. At an annual salary of $80,000 per job — and that would seem somewhat extravagant, since not all the jobs will be unionized — we could have paid all 25,000 of those people full salary just to stay home for six-and-a-half years.

If you’ve been wondering how the feds and VW arrived at CDN$13 billion, it’s simply the Canadian government matching the roughly US$10 billion the company would have received

But that’s just standard populist bafflegab served to rile up the Poilievre crowd. More telling, however, is how much tax revenue those jobs must generate to pay back that $13 billion. Using my handy-dandy tax calculator — taxtips.ca, a program that emulates Revenue Canada calculations — each of those jobs would generate a little less than $16,000 dollars in tax, provincial and federal combined. In other words, those 25,000 workers would have to work more than 30 years for their tax revenues to repay the monies Trudeau’s Liberals are so generously doling out.

Of course, that doesn’t account for the various corporate taxes that will fill Ottawa’s coffers over that same time frame. However, even if various business revenues account for two-thirds of the tax haul that will be generated by all those jobs, that still leaves a 10-year payback period. And that’s with a hyper-inflated estimation it’ll generate 25,000 jobs; if you use a more realistic number for job creation — say, 15,000 — the numbers look even worse.

However many jobs are involved, and whatever the actual split between corporate and personal tax revenues might be, we’re looking at a truly extended payback period. At today’s interest rates, I‘m pretty sure I could find any number of actuaries who would suggest that paying down our federal debt by $13 billion — or, actually, not taking on new debt — would be a better investment.

Read the bottom line

The Stellantis Windsor Assembly Plant is shown on Thursday, November 4, 2021 Photo by Dan Janisse /Windsor Star

Grotesque amounts of money aside, there’s more than a normal amount of politicking going on here. Without having access to any of the final agreements the government signed with both car companies, any interpretation of what Stellantis is after is pure conjecture.

What we do know, however, is that Stellantis signed its agreement with the Ontario and federal governments to build its battery-manufacturing plant in Windsor in March 2022, while the IRA was only signed in August of last year. How much of these negotiations are — totally justified — sour grapes, and how much is really the federal government not meeting commitments it previously made? That’s impossible to know, but it does raise one final, very important, question.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Does the U.S. government still consider Stellantis ‘American?’

One of the persistent rumours surrounding the Inflation Reduction Act is that America’s domestic automakers had a heads-up regarding — or perhaps even they were consulted on — its enormous subsidies. That would hardly be surprising, since the one thing pretty much everyone can agree on is that the IRA has nothing to do with reducing inflation, and everything to do with protecting American autoworkers.

If this scuttlebutt holds any water, then, it begs the question of why Stellantis would sign an accord with Canadian governments when it knew bigger money — waaay bigger money — was right across the border. The company was created, you’ll remember, in 2021, with the merger of Fiat-Chrysler and France’s PSA Group, and its stocks are listed on the Euronext exchanges in Paris and Milan, as well as New York’s NYSE. Is it possible that Stellantis had no idea of the monies that could come its way if it built its battery plant in the good ol’ U.S. of A, while Ford and General Motors did?

Or is Stellantis actually claiming it did have full knowledge of how much was promised in the IRA, and that the Canadian government made Volkswagen-like promises that have yet to be fulfilled? Who knows? But, when you’re talking billions of dollars to be paid out each and every year all the way to 2032, the politicking, it would seem, gets way more protracted.